Sunday, May 14, 2017

"What it's really like to have your drink spiked"

This piece was published for News.com.au on the 13th of May, 2017. Available here.

--------

ON Anzac Day Eve this year, a frolicking night out became a wakeful nightmare.
I was a few beers deep, mingling with the crowds at my local haunt — when at some point in the night, I felt a strangeness wash over me.
It was as if a massive wave of panic had managed to infiltrate my brain; adrenaline ran through me and I was thrown into a tailspin.
I assumed this was an anxiety attack and took myself home. Yet the feelings continued; I lay awake in my bed for hours. My stomach turned and my head pulsed with maddening panic, to the point where I debated hospital.
After some time, calculating the beers I’d had versus the way I was feeling, it became clear that my drink had been spiked.
I wouldn’t have known it, if it hadn’t already happened to me.
Experts believe that the majority of drink spikings occur as a prank. Often it’s assumed that spiking occurs with intent to sexually assault someone — however this only accounts for one-third of all spikings. The sad fact is that most of the time it’s the result of a cold-hearted lout looking to get laughs. To purposefully endanger someone’s life for a joke.
The first time my drink was spiked, in 2012, I nearly lost my life.
I was a night-life photographer living la vida loca in the city of Melbourne. I was on the job … and with that job came certain benefits, like drink vouchers. Everything was going swimmingly. I must have set down my glass.
Brandon Cook with fellow photographer Daisy Hofstetter. Picture: Daisy Hofstetter
Brandon Cook with fellow photographer Daisy Hofstetter. Picture: Daisy HofstetterSource:Supplied
My memory gets very foggy then. One minute I was at the bar. The next, I’m in an alleyway, on my phone, complaining about feeling strange.
A flash — I’m on a train, vomiting bile onto the floor. Flash forward — in a car, Dad in the driver’s seat. I’m green and blue and every colour I shouldn’t be. They claimed they’d never seen anyone that messed up before.
Hours later, I couldn’t keep food or liquids down. All I could feel was pain and delirium. Then my chest began to race — far too fast. I screamed in fear and pain as Mum scrambled to call 000. I had to be taken in to hospital due to irregularities of my heart.
That episode led to me getting heart surgery to rectify whatever issue the drink spiking had caused.
Doctors performed keyhole surgery on my heart, feeding wires via my groin, to perform an ablation. Basically they had to locate the parts of my heart that were malfunctioning and burn or “ablate” them.
I spent the next few months in recovery. All from what was most likely someone else’s idea of mischief.
Of course, the recovery didn’t end there. In the years that followed, I dealt with major psychological issues. I grew mistrustful around drinks. I struggled to consume fluids, even in my own house, because my brain would tell me that my drink was spiked — even if those drinks were accepted from members of my family.
Brandon Cook. Picture: Brandon Cook
Brandon Cook. Picture: Brandon CookSource:Supplied
There’s only been one study done in Australia on the prevalence of drink spiking, involving only 44 cases — many muddied up as they rely on victims’ disclosures rather than actual toxicology reports from hospitals.
This leads people to feel sceptical of those who claim to have been spiked, dismissing them as binge drinkers. The reality is that most don’t have the tools to recognise it as a problem, let alone to understand that it’s happening to them.
And yet I know that so many people in the community deal with these issues, because venue managers and hospitality staff I know have to handle the outcomes. To the point where it’s common practice for staff to get rid of half-empty glasses if they’ve been left unattended, because you simply can’t trust patrons not to put drugs in them.
Yet so many people dismiss the risk of spiking, being careless with their booze and flippant on their nights out.
So look after yourselves on your nights out. Keep a close eye on your drinks. And if you feel that massive wave of panic, do what I was nearly too late to do: Take yourselves to hospital.
There’s no shame in seeking care because you suspect that a crime has been committed. And I’d rather go to hospital and be told I’m fine — than go home in a heap, head pulsing with maddening panic, nowhere near fine at all.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

"What rehab taught me about drug use in Australia's gay community": Star Observer April essay, online version.

This piece was originally published in-print as the long-form personal essay in the April edition of Star Observer, Australia's longest-running monthly gay magazine. Now available online, here.

--------

FOR the past two weeks I have been an inpatient at a private psychiatric hospital in Melbourne. I’m in the addictions program, because for eighteen months I’ve struggled through a substance abuse problem involving crystal methamphetamine.
The first time I used ‘ice’, it was in the apartment of a man I’d just met via a gay “dating” app. I’d been out, boozing away an October night, and he was among the most attractive men I’d ever laid eyes on. I couldn’t believe that someone like him – with that body, and that face – wanted me to pay him a visit.
That morning escalated into a full day of non-stop partying, as I was introduced to a drug that was made to reel you in. It’s a factual statement when people say it’s amazing, because it’s incredible by design. It chemically induces a massive dump of dopamine and serotonin, and is, in that way and many others, absurdly addictive.When I arrived, we made small talk mid-undress, before he pulled out a pipe. I hesitated. I’d heard all of the horror stories – my mother would often pull me aside in my adolescence, showing me videos detailing “the horrors of meth use”. But when he offered I remember thinking, “I can’t say no to this man. He’s way too hot. I’ll never get this chance again.” – So I took it.
I remember the aftermath being horrific. The comedown tore me asunder, and I swore I’d never do it again. Then midweek, when the horrible consequences had faded, a little voice in my head – I describe it as ‘a voice that doesn’t belong to you’, a creeping vampire – started to whisper, “You could definitely do that again.”
What was a brief tryst became an unstoppable problem. I went on to overdose twice. I’ve been taken to emergency more times than I can count. And every time I lapsed, I became so ashamed that I would take myself to hospital, because the alternative was to hurl myself from a nearby bridge. It was an addiction, and at the start of this year, something snapped. I knew I needed that extra bit of help.
So here I am, on this bed, in my room – Room 3.19 – facing my demons in all their hideous glory, for what I hope is the first and last time.
Mine isn’t the type of addiction you see in the media, and it’s certainly not the standard crystal meth habit witnessed by the nurses in this clinic. Australia’s cultural narrative surrounding ice use involves topics like homelessness, violence and poverty. While homelessness and the like are certainly plausible factors, those elements don’t typically involve gay men. My addiction wasn’t just to the ice; it was to the sex as well. It was an insidious combination that had me fantasising about taking ice and having sex, until suddenly I couldn’t have sex without wanting ice.
This is the reality for gay men all over the world. This is chemsex. It’s a topic that has been barely broached by our mainstream media in Australia. Sure, it’s been researched by Triple J’s Hack, and explored in brutally honest documentaries like VICE’s Chemsex – but I’ve never heard a story told that wasn’t viewed through the lens of journalistic voyeurism. So I, as a drug addict in recovery, am telling mine.
The difference between caring for yourself in the outside world, and caring for yourself in rehab, is that on the outside, you can ignore your problems. You can mute the world and reject concern, visit a counsellor once a week to say, “Hey, I’ve got a problem” – only to forget their words the following fortnight from your half-an-hour session, blindly declaring “I can’t remember what we talked about. And I didn’t do the homework.”
Yet in rehab, there is no escape from your woes. They stare you in the face every day when you get up to look at yourself, in the mirror of your suicide-proof bathroom. When you’re chain-smoking on the foyer pavement with the yellow line dictating where you cannot cross, you are thinking about your addiction. When you’re in group therapy, you are being forced into cycles of cravings and introspection. And when you visit your psychiatrist, you’re constantly reminded of your progress and the horrors that brought you here.
I used to think, “There’s no clarity like relapse”.
Fuck that. There’s no clarity like rehab.
But when it comes to a topic like chemsex, the nurses on your floor, the group therapists and your psychiatrist might not fully comprehend the complexity of your addiction. The severity of chemsex trends is a relatively recent development for the mainstream health sector, the issue amongst gay men being primarily dealt with through gay community organisations.
As my nurses are assessing me, I can’t help but think, “You don’t understand at all”. As I sit through my addictions groups, I’m wondering if these programs – tailored to alcoholics unable to function without thirty-six beers in a night, and pill-poppers incapable of walking past a chemist without gut-churning desire – are at all beneficial to me. I tell myself I’m not your “usual addict”. I’m not like any of these people. I don’t have it quite like they do.
And yet I am hesitant about venturing back into the world. I fear the world of gay men, gay culture, community health organisations and rampant substance misuse. For the simple reason that I’m not sure I’d get much help there, either.
Gay men in Australia despise being pathologised. We’ve grown up being told that we’re somehow defective. That our very beings are a scourge and our sex lives forbidden. As a result, we’ve developed our own communities; “safe spaces” won through a desperate fight for survival during very difficult decades. We’ve earned these spaces as gifts from struggling forefathers.
We’ve inherited gay sexual liberation among these spaces – and we have it, in spades. It’s in our dildo-adorned window displays in gay districts, our saunas and sex-on-premises venues, our gay magazines and advertising campaigns. Gay sexual liberation is everywhere.
Our nightclubs are awash in party drugs used “for pleasure”, recreationally. In the past, there were drugs like MDMA and ecstasy, and rarely would you see men checking into treatment clinics with issues involving addiction. We fought for the right to use these drugs, against all eyebrows raising and finger-wagging. And how dare you ever infer that we could ever be addicts, and that we are anything other than liberated homosexuals.
Now, newer struggles to coincide with our successes have been bestowed upon the younger generation.  More powerful drugs have entered the scene, like crystal meth and GHB. These are drugs that have real consequences, which cost lives in both the short-term and the long. All over the world, frightening tides of change are rising, as more gay men enter addiction services and emergency clinics due to crystal methamphetamine and GHB misuse. Our self-messaging – “How dare you imply we could ever be addicts? We’re powerful and free” – simply isn’t working as we’d hoped it would.
Gay health organisations in Australia notoriously understate the severity of the problem. Australian gay reviewers berated Chemsex for being “sensationalised’ and “exploitative” – when myself and so many addicts in recovery saw it as nothing more than an honest depiction of a brutal truth.
And we call meth ‘Tina’ – the name of a fun party girl – to distract from the reality of the risky substance we’re using.
These are growing trends we never had with ecstasy or MDMA. We never saw them during our fight for gay sexual liberation. We never lost men to seedy apartments in weeklong benders on powerful drugs capable of stopping our hearts, easily accessed via our gay “dating” apps. And yet here they are, these hurricane horrors, with chokehold vice-grips on the throats of our youth, young ones ill-equipped to handle them.
I fear returning to my ordinary world; because I worry those safe spaces have become stagnant. These spaces need to be re-imagined, reinvented to help a newer generation of homosexual men unable to withstand the greater forces that push against them.
I love my community. I love its vibrancy, its colour, and its insistence on responding to hatred with love. I love the victories we’ve made, whether for gay sexual liberation or the right to simply exist. What I do not love – I cannot – is the resistance towards vulnerability; the stone-cold advertorials for gay nightclubs, which purport that to be a gay man, is to be harsh, fuck-mad and the visual embodiment of physical perfection.
We come together in times of strife – then trot along to our gay bars and clubs, full of judgment, vitriol and value based solely on aesthetics. We need to do more than just get intoxicated and show off our sexiness; we must turn them into places where we can meet as real-time humans. Places where we can discuss more kindly the issues we don’t talk about online.  Places where we can be vulnerable, at last, after so many years of strife.
The time to fight for gay sexual liberation and safe spaces is over, those victories won. The time to redefine them is here. And we must do so from a place of self-awareness and self-care, with compassion for our partners and our friends, through trying years of greater risks and more ferocious harms.
I remember I had an overdose that saw me riding on a gurney into an emergency room. The hospital didn’t have any beds available – full of people with real problems, not self-inflicted – so I was left in emergency, unable to rest or sleep, my heart pounding and head throbbing, feeling like I was going to die, for eight straight hours.
I have survived to stand here, sober and in recovery. Here I am in rehab, getting the help that I need. But I will never forget that night. I never want to feel that way again.
And I don’t want anyone else in my community to feel that way either.

Sunday, March 26, 2017

'BRANDON COOK: After a stay in rehab for ice addiction, I realise the fight for gay sexual liberation is won'

In April's edition of Star Observer, Australia's largest monthly national LGBTI magazine since 1979, I wrote the feature essay, which was spread out over two pages. 

It was on the topic of my substance misuse problem, my rehab stay, on chemsex and on redefining safe spaces in the gay community.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

'Brendan Maclean Wants You To Stop Being Such A Prude About Gay Sex'

Article for Junkee.com published the 1st of March 2017; an interview with musician and artistic provocateur Brendan Maclean, on the publication of his decidedly-X-rated music video House Of Air,  the cultural and social significance of the clip, and on the ensuing firestorm of hate-trolls that followed.

'Queer Eye is coming back, but it's not the LGBT celebration we need right now'

This piece was published for Daily Life / The Sydney Morning Herald, on March 1st 2017.
Available here.
--------
With Mardi Gras at our doorsteps and gays flocking to Sydney's LGBT heartland, it's the perfect time to reminisce on queer culture past and present. Straight-man makeovers, anyone? 
Keen to bank off our apparently irrepressible appetite for resuscitating TV shows from the '00s, Netflix last month announced the return of Queer Eye For The Straight Guy, ordering a new series comprising eight episodes. 
As a gay man, you might think I'd be excited. In fact, I'm anything but.
Between 2003 and 2007, Queer Eye aired on the Bravo network. The premise was simple: Five outwardly homosexual men – known as the Fab Five – gloriously invaded the worlds of heterosexual civilians, revamping their lives, their outfits and their homes, in an effort to impress their partners, families and friends.
There was Ted Allen, the food-and-wine expert; Kyan Douglas, the "grooming guru"; Thom Filicia, interior designer; Carson Kressley, fierce fashionista, and Jai Rodriguez, culture and social savant. The show was beloved by audiences across the globe, winning 2 GLAAD awards and an Emmy. A new Fab Five, who will set alight the lives of a new range of hopeless hetero homebodies, will replace the original cast.
In a decade where television revivals are all the rage – see Gilmore Girls and the soon-to-be-reinvigorated Will & Grace – this comeback serves as no surprise. Yet despite being excited to see gay men returning to mainstream audiences in a popularised capacity, I find myself uncomfortable and questioning: Will the Netflix Queer Eye reboot adhere to modern times for a modern audience – or will it stay true to the original? And if so, is that actually a good thing?
I fear that this reboot won't be a cultural delight – rather GayLite™; a hollowed-out representation of homosexuality, for mainstream crowds who so often shriek, "Look at those fabulous queers!"
The original Queer Eye stands as what one might call a "museum piece" about gay culture; a reflection of the ways mainstream producers preferred to present homosexuals in order to avoid putting off the masses. The Fab Five – though delectable in so many ways – were caricatures of gay men by their very design, sanitised for straight people's consumption.
They were Queer Guys For Straight Eyes, and served merely to solidify the notion that gay men were limp-wristed queers who existed to glitter up your wardrobes and your lives. They represented the gay best friend and the flamboyant uncles who we all recognise in pop culture: those homosexual icons who reflected just enough gayness to be considered comically endearing, but never enough to make straight people uncomfortable.
Though we loved the Fab Five, we never knew them as anything other than our stylists, our hairdressers and our interior designers.
Gay men in the early 2000s were rarely ever depicted as sexual beings, and remained perpetually single. Any reflection of their love interests or sex lives was seen as too unconventional – or worse, degenerate – to exhibit to mainstream audiences. And those shows that did present homosexuals as three-dimensional humans – ones who loved, lusted and lived through crises faced by real-life gay people – were labelled "indie" or "underground", such as the forever-fantastic Queer As Folk.
Yet this is 2017: Gay is no longer a euphemism for flamboyant (or vice versa). And while fabulousness is certainly part of queer culture, it's only one side of a complex movement that continues to gain rights and strengths, while also enduring ongoing ordeals.
We finally have gay sex scenes being aired on television in shows like How To Get Away With Murder, with the same passionate ferocity as heterosexual lovemaking. We have LGBT culture and history depicted for not only its unfamiliar quirks, but for the struggles that we've faced throughout history. Uncomfortable queer topics are at last being broached – like coming out, living with HIV, and the struggle with being seen as inherently feminine in a man's world – in Emmy-winning shows like RuPaul's Drag Race.
These depictions of the "gay lifestyle" don't exist in the modern media as a slap in the face to homophobic audiences. They are present because gay people exist in your lives. These are our struggles and our stories, and after years of having them stifled for fear of sparking discomfort, we are finally having them told.
We have wept rivers of tears for fallen peers subjected to homophobic violence, and we've felt the hand of ostracism from broader society and bigoted governments. In 2017, these welts and bruises are finally on display for all to see – and we love you, our straight friends and families, for openly soothing our wounds.
When audiences cry out with excitement for the return of the Five and squeal, "This'll be so gay!" – know that the word means more than cultural queendom or a flair for hair.
If Netflix wishes to reboot the fabled Queer Eye, it should do so with caution, care, and concern for our history. It should make direct eye contact with its audience; aspire to lead them with not only a sartorial hand, but also one that expresses the nuances of gay culture.
The new Queer Eye must not merely represent our hairdressers, our stylists and our interior designers – it must represent our gay brothers, sisters and friends. And the new Fab Five must embody real-life gay men; thoughtful, independent, and shaped by shared queer struggle. Not cartoonish caricatures for mainstream consumption.
Now excuse me, I have a costume to prepare. 

Sunday, February 12, 2017

The copulating crackhead of St. Kilda

UPDATE: This piece has been reprinted on the Community website for 56 Dean Street, Europe's busiest sexual health clinic, as part of their Wellbeing programme. 



Three years ago, an old tutor of mine wrote a piece about his alcoholism - aptly titled The Copulating Pisshead Of Brunswick - in which he reminisced upon the circumstances that led to the image of him naked in a sink with face burrowed in tomorrow's regret, along with his desire to quit the drink.

"I can go without a drink indefinitely but one sniff of the barmaid's apron and I need to drink myself into a stupor. Alcohol has no single definition. The Hollywood version is all about drinkers getting up and pouring a sneaky dram of whisky into their coffee or downing a beer before breakfast. The reality is far from this."

And it is. And it isn't. And it's everything but.

I remember in the week after I first used ice, I felt the pangs of temptation crawl into my brain like an earwig with a mouth that somehow knew how to whisper in my own voice. I remember telling my doctor about the images of the future I was having; of being alone a year from now, a shameful addict down a streetway in St. Kilda. I remember saying that those visions felt utterly real to me, like I were Alice peering down the Looking Glass and if I leaned too far forward I might fall in.

But that was eighteen months ago, and this is a Sunday of February in 2017.

In two weeks I have raised over seven thousand dollars to go to rehab, via the apparently novel approach of crowdfunding. I was public about my substance issues before, but the plea for help and the donations that followed have had me answering a lot of questions.

More than that, however, I've fielded many a side-eye. Sometimes it feels like concern, and other times it feels like suspicion - how addicted are you, and why should anyone give you money? Yet I don't pretend to be anything more or less than an addict.

The Hollywood version of crystal meth abuse consists of three parts: Homelessness, violence and poverty. Those are the motifs broadcast on our screens, of men unable to get out of bed without a pipe, and of angry dogs barking behind chain link fences. Only not unlike the myth of the inherently savage pup, it isn't nature, but nurture, and society grips those folk in cycles of poverty and homelessness by telling them we'll fix them while providing barely any care, then being horrified when they lapse.

That was never my addiction. I never needed a pipe to get out of bed, and I never robbed or stole or aggressed. As an addict, the easiest way to close the gap between you and a nurse in an emergency ward is to clarify, "Just so you know, I'm not feeling aggressive, just suicidal."

My vice continued the same way that it began: in a sleazy apartment and the arms of a stranger after a boozy night out, in trepidation of the consequences, but knowing the thrill of the oncoming storm to be irresistible without the windows down and the chill rain on my face. Then when the deed was done, I'd spend every day thereafter in shame, ignoring the earwig-with-a-mouth whispering sweet nothings, waiting for it to die and fade.

Yet I'd inevitably return to disinhibition and would - sometimes always, other times rarely - lapse. Lapsing is a fantastic way to ensure overdoing it, or to straight-up overdose. It continued this way for eighteen months. Rinse, remorse, repeat.

While this might sound nothing like the popularised addict, it's no less of an addiction. I've met people who used once a week for three months and people who used every day for two years, and they've all recalled the same feelings: gut-churning desire. The propensity towards lapsing when intoxicated. Devastating shame. The earwig-with-a-mouth.

This is the addict that barely any see. This is the addict hidden in a sleazy apartment, using "for pleasure", functional but not frightful. This is the addict ignored by A Current Affair, replaced with sinister gore-porn and hysteria.

Yet it can be no less grim. Some people can use regularly in the long-term and feel no backlash from the brain - but others can use once a week for no time at all and collapse into psychiatric care. Combine any amount of crystal meth with pre-existing mental health conditions - my depression and anxiety, for example - and any use can go from dabble to disastrous in months, not years.

I have fought and raged against the machine, only to fail time and time again. I felt my mental state falter and my will to live abate and my options run out. I saw the ground fall out from beneath me, and I suddenly knew that any more rinse, remorse, repeat, would lead to greater ills than I ever wanted.

And I remember a year after my first time, wandering through a backstreet in St. Kilda wired and flying high, all dirty faced with moon pupils looking for the next sleazy apartment, becoming suddenly aware that I had become the vision of myself I had seen a year earlier. I was Alice, and I had fallen through the looking glass.

So I asked for help to purge the bugs from my brain, and by the grace of beautiful creatures, I got it. I remember my mistakes and their horrible aftermaths. I am nostalgic and desiring and afraid. But soon I will go to rehab, and when I get out I will know that in speaking my piece I will have helped expand the tunnel vision of the Hollywood meth addict and allowed my voice to do good.

And, like the copulating pisshead of Brunswick, I will get up and just get on with making it all better.

Thursday, February 9, 2017

'It's 2017, and parents are still rejecting their children because they are gay'

This piece was published for Daily Life / The Sydney Morning Herald, on February 8th 2017. Available here.

----

Over the past two weeks, Channel 7 has graced our screens with a new and controversial television concept known as Bride & Prejudice. The series tracks the lives of several couples wishing to get married, with the key conflict that their families do not approve, each couple challenging their families' perceptions on age, sexuality, religion and race.
One of these couples is an Australian man named Chris and his American partner Grant. In Monday nights' second episode, Chris confronted both his parents and requested their attendance at his wedding – which both of them refused.
His mother cited religious beliefs as her reasoning, while his father made vague disavowals hinting at homophobic "old-school values".
Not only did Chris' parents reject the concept of his marriage, but they went on to reject his very being – decrying his sexuality as a tragedy. The scene had audiences shaken, with dozens of commentators leaping forward on social media to defend Chris' decision to marry, and to express their anger at the sheer burning dismissal that his parents made clear.
Of course, you wouldn't do that. You would love your child no matter what their orientation, and embrace them no matter whom they loved. To you, this might seem utterly unreal.To heterosexual audiences, and particularly to parents, this rejection might seem like an impossible affront. How could a mother, who gave birth to a child, and a father, who together with her raised that child to adulthood, go on to reject their flesh and blood because of who he loves? My own aunt – bless her - cried, "How could a mother be so bloody cold?"
Yet to people like myself, and so many gay viewers across the country – this scene was far too real, and represented a burning fear come to life before our eyes.
It's a panic that resides in the heart of every single homosexual, bisexual or transgender person ever born into a family unit. That our families will reject us should we choose to live openly, and that the strength we've gained from familial bonds will wither away and leave us to fight life's battles on our own.
As we grow up, we're taught very quickly what a man should be – and what he shouldn't. A man can never be feminine. He can never prance, never show emotion – above all, he can never be gay. From when we first begin to comprehend the world around us, LGBT people are caught up in the homophobic bigotry that our society has instilled in us all.
And because of that, the very moment we figure out what we are – homosexual, gay, faggot – we descend into psychological self-torment, terrified of what it means, and what kind of life we would be met with should we ever choose to embrace it.
We understand that some people hate us, and that some even want us dead.
Our forefathers had it worse than us – the AIDS crisis associated gayness with death and disease, stirring up existing homophobia until families the world over disowned blood relations in fear and disgust. In this time, in this decade, we think we've moved beyond seeing parents disown their children over their sexuality. But it's still going on, and most never surface in either viral videos or on television.
Even suspecting disapproval from your family is to feel like a black sheep, reading hostility where there may be none. It's to live in trepidation that the penny may one day drop – that your own blood will run cold in the veins of your parents; that they'll reject you over a crucial part of your humanity that you simply cannot change.
And it is crucial. We haven't grown up in a world rife with homophobia only to devalue our sexualities as of no importance. We understand that some people hate us, and that some even want us dead.
Our sexuality is nothing, because it should never be a reason to hate – but it is also everything, because of the pain we have suffered. We carry it as both a burden and a strength, built from weathering a lifetime of homophobic abuse. We gain empathy from our struggle and use it to love more passionately. 
Nothing, no-one, could harm us more than our families – the ones who swore they'd love us forever, no matter our ills – spurning us because of who we are.
Heterosexual families might view this all as a morbid impossibility, the rejection of their child utterly implausible. But when Chris in Bride & Prejudice sat in stoic silence as his parents rejected his plea for their blessing, it was a stab in the gut for every gay person watching; a realisation of the sickly fear each of us have held in our hearts since the moment we knew we were different.